From: | Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Syntax error in a large COPY |
Date: | 2007-11-06 21:08:27 |
Message-ID: | 200711062208.28741.regmeplease@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Il Tuesday 06 November 2007 19:43:38 Scott Marlowe ha scritto:
> On 11/6/07, Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > That seems not to be the case.
> > The last line has a \. by its own and the last but one is
> > well formed.
>
> (Please don't top post...)
>
> Got a self contained test case you can post?
Back to the original topic ...
I'm trying to understand what and where.
The point is that I have this 29M+ lines script telling me there's a problem
somewhere.
A self contained test, at the moment, would be that long!
I'm considering a "branch and bound" approach ... but it'd be quite long
and tedious as the program generating the script has not been written
to do such things.
I'm pretty sure that the interpreter knows exactly where the problem
is. It's just missing to tell it.
Unless there's some friendly advise.
--
Reg me Please
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-11-06 21:13:15 | Re: Syntax error in a large COPY |
Previous Message | Rainer Bauer | 2007-11-06 21:03:52 | Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ? |