From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Trout <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata |
Date: | 2007-11-02 16:23:48 |
Message-ID: | 20071102092348.2f5608f1@scratch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:40:46 -0400
Jeff Trout <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Asking here since it may deal with clever things such as alignment
> and or binary reps.
>
> I'm migrating from some opterons to some xeons (E5345) both are
> running x86_64. At first I figured I'd need to dump & load my data,
> which will be painful. But on a whim I made a test db on the
> opteron, copied it over (tar) and it fired up and worked fine on the
> xeon. Seeing the success of this, I took our PITR backup and
> restored it properly, and everything seems to be functioning
> correctly from my tests.
x86_64 is x86_64, regardless of intel or amd.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHK08WATb/zqfZUUQRAtRcAKCoh0UqQJCfCbRltsfdqgaoPpa/SACePsRQ
t3/gNGb9/Lus6JaiVj3yhuA=
=6vs/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-02 16:25:48 | Re: minimal update |
Previous Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2007-11-02 16:22:50 | Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint |