From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Date: | 2007-10-27 00:24:37 |
Message-ID: | 200710261724.37573.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> This seems pretty entirely orthogonal to the commit-fest proposal.
> I see no reason to think that snapshots taken at those times would
> be any better than any other nightly snapshot, nor any reason
> to memorialize them in an archive.
I can see that. And it would be pretty hard to keep members of the public
from treating the persistent snapshots as releases, and then flooding the
lists when they break.
So, scratch an idea with unintended consequences. I'll just have to keep
the snapshots on our CVS slave.
I do hope that the commit-fests will lead to more testing, though, just
because people waiting for a specific feature will want to try out the
initial commit of that feature.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-27 02:06:19 | Avoiding planning redundant backwards merges |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-27 00:05:10 | Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux |