Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date: 2007-10-24 13:34:25
Message-ID: 20071024133425.GD14328@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't recall that we've rejected any patches lately just because they
> were unidiffs. But I'd be sad if a large fraction of incoming patches
> started to be unidiffs.

We bounce them back to the author pretty m uch every time with "context
diff please". But I don't recall any case where the patch was actually
rejected because of a submitter refusing to provide -c diff.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-24 13:35:41 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-24 13:24:47 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4