| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Schwarzer <stefan(dot)schwarzer(at)grid(dot)unep(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster? |
| Date: | 2007-10-24 12:05:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20071024080547.3745a3fb.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Stefan Schwarzer <stefan(dot)schwarzer(at)grid(dot)unep(dot)ch>:
> Hi there,
>
> I read dozens of times the "TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster"...
>
> Now, what am I supposed to do if I launched a query which takes ages,
> and which I want to interrupt?
>
> Thanks for any advice,
Tracing through the other threads, this is obviously not the regular
wayward query, but one that won't die by the normal methods.
Unfortunately, I came across this recently, and the only solution I
found was to do a "pg_ctl restart -m i" (Yes, I tried -m f first).
Luckily, the db in question was such that the front ends didn't
suffer horribly from this and reconnected, and that the database
finished up its recovery in a timely manner.
Hopefully, I can generate a reproducible example so I can file a
bug, but haven't gotten that far with it yet.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | luca.ciciriello | 2007-10-24 13:06:03 | using libpq.lib in Microsoft C++ (managed) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-24 12:01:13 | Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster? |