Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing

Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
> > On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:42 , Tom Lane wrote:
> >> apart_hword Part of hyphenated word, all ASCII letters
> >> part_hword Part of hyphenated word, all letters
> >> numpart_hword Part of hyphenated word, mixed letters and digits
>
> > Is there a rationale for using these instead of hword_apart,
> > hword_part and hword_numpart?
>
> Only that the category names were constructed that way in the contrib
> module, and so this would seem familiar to existing tsearch2 users.
> However, we are changing enough other details of the tsearch
> configuration that maybe that's not a very strong consideration.
>
> I have no objection in principle to choosing nicer names, except
> that I would like to avoid a long-drawn-out discussion. Is there
> general approval of Michael's suggestion?

+1

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.