Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date: 2007-10-23 17:07:35
Message-ID: 20071023100735.1b67e6ff@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:45:14 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We develop and commit like normal *until* the community feels there
> > is enough for release. Then we announce a feature freeze.
> >
> >
>
> No, I think this is hopeless on several grounds. First, it increases
> uncertainty. People need to be able to work towards a target. Second,
> there will always be a temptation to "just squeeze in killer feature
> X".

Well that flows into that checkpoint idea I think.

>
> I think there is some virtue in Simon's suggestion, provided that
> adequate reviewer resources are available. That might mean you need
> to put on your fundraising hat and raise some reviewer sponsorship
> money.

Did someone say money? ;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-10-23 17:24:20 Re: PostgreSQL performance issues
Previous Message Trevor Talbot 2007-10-23 17:07:14 Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit