Re: Ready for beta2?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Ready for beta2?
Date: 2007-10-22 13:25:03
Message-ID: 200710220925.04071.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday 21 October 2007 22:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
> >
> > Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually getting people to test there are
> > known issues and changes with Beta1 that have made it pretty much a
> > useless Beta.
>
> Agreed --- at this point we know we've forced initdb, plus there are
> those known locale issues on Windows, so it's a bit hard to ask someone
> to install beta1 if they haven't already. I think what we need to do
> next is get to closure on the open issues and get a beta2 out ASAP.
<snip>
> Can anyone think of any other issues that should be considered beta2
> stoppers? (No, the contrib documentation isn't one...)
>

There was talk that the txid contrib module could be folded into core should
we do an initdb post beta; has that idea been revisted now that we have?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roberto Icardi 2007-10-22 13:26:37 pgadmin debug on windows
Previous Message Deblauwe Gino 2007-10-22 13:24:42 Re: PostgreSQL performance issues