Re: Ready for beta2?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ready for beta2?
Date: 2007-10-22 08:14:43
Message-ID: 20071022081443.GB15375@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm also not totally clear on whether we are happy with the Windows
> > locale situation yet. Comments from the Win32 contingent?
>
> I'm happy that UTF-8 support is now working again, but not happy that
> initdb and pg_control will report (for example) "English_United
> Kingdom.1252" despite my cluster being in UTF-8, not WIN1252. It seems
> that's always been the case though, just that noone pointed it out before.

Bah, Dave beat me to it by a minute or two. But yes, that's the one thing
that I can see is still there. And yes, it's always been that way.

> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
> not support).

I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean
way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or
may not be a good thing).

I specifically don't support rewriting it to .65001, becase that will
generate a locale name that's not valid. The same argument about clean way
applies here :-)

> This is a cosmetic issue of course.

Agreed.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-10-22 08:23:16 Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-10-22 07:59:07 Re: Ready for beta2?