From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ready for beta2? |
Date: | 2007-10-22 08:14:43 |
Message-ID: | 20071022081443.GB15375@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm also not totally clear on whether we are happy with the Windows
> > locale situation yet. Comments from the Win32 contingent?
>
> I'm happy that UTF-8 support is now working again, but not happy that
> initdb and pg_control will report (for example) "English_United
> Kingdom.1252" despite my cluster being in UTF-8, not WIN1252. It seems
> that's always been the case though, just that noone pointed it out before.
Bah, Dave beat me to it by a minute or two. But yes, that's the one thing
that I can see is still there. And yes, it's always been that way.
> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
> not support).
I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean
way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or
may not be a good thing).
I specifically don't support rewriting it to .65001, becase that will
generate a locale name that's not valid. The same argument about clean way
applies here :-)
> This is a cosmetic issue of course.
Agreed.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-10-22 08:23:16 | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-22 07:59:07 | Re: Ready for beta2? |