From: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench |
Date: | 2007-10-18 03:21:13 |
Message-ID: | 20071018120752.8A98.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > All of filler fields in branches, tellers and history is NULL. It is
> > probabbly a mistake because there are fields of char(22-88) in the table
> > definitions.
> > TPC-B requires at least 100 bytes per row for all tables used in it.
>
> I'm not in favor of changing this. pgbench has never pretended to be
> "really" TPC-B, nor has anyone ever tried to compare its numbers against
> other TPC-B numbers. On the other hand, people *do* compare pgbench
> numbers to itself over time, and if we make a change like this it will
> break comparability of the results.
Ok, I feel it reasonable.
The attached is a patch to mention it in the source code.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-tpcb.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julius Stroffek | 2007-10-18 13:20:05 | Re: 'on insert do instead' rule with a where clause responds 'INSERT 0 0' |
Previous Message | Douglas Toltzman | 2007-10-18 01:17:55 | Re: BUG #3680: memory leak when excuting a SQL "selectcount(id) from chinatelecom; " |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacky Leng | 2007-10-18 06:04:15 | Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WALarchiving is enabled |
Previous Message | Jacky Leng | 2007-10-18 01:27:49 | Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled |