Re: Suggestions for Remote Procedure Calls from PG, please?

From: Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestions for Remote Procedure Calls from PG, please?
Date: 2007-10-18 09:07:07
Message-ID: 200710180707.08422.jgodoy@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Em Thursday 18 October 2007 01:44:33 Bret Schuhmacher escreveu:
>
> Thanks for the reply, Tom. I was thinking I could have my remote
> process send a message back to PG via XMLBlaster, too. XMLBlaster is
> a MOM-like message-queuing app that guarantees delivery to
> subscribers. (www.xmlblaster.org) The problem, as you stated,
> though, is transactional integrity :-(. Hmmm, I'll see about the
> to-do queue idea.

You can try implementing a queue, Bret. Make it a FIFO queue and poll from it
regularly. Ten make your transaction insert a record on that queue and take
your action based on that.

A table as simple as:

id SERIAL, -- you can have a routine to reset this when empty
table TEXT, -- includes schema
primary_key TEXT -- to allow for numeric and text PKs

would allow you to retrieve the row that has been changed and take your action
based on that.

--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jehan.procaccia 2007-10-18 09:23:02 Re: move databases files location
Previous Message postgresql.*.thewild 2007-10-18 07:06:17 Re: dblink and hostname resolution problem