Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Date: 2007-10-17 15:01:16
Message-ID: 20071017150116.GN5031@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> I think that's a good idea. Attached is a patch that implements this (I
> think - haven't messed around in that area of the code before). Thoughts?

Cool, thanks!

My only comment is that you should probably stick to one 'zero'
convention- either '!canlogin' or 'canlogin == 0'. I prefer the former,
but the inconsistancy in a single patch is kind of odd. I'm not sure if
there's an overall PG preference.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-10-17 15:15:05 Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2007-10-17 14:47:17 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Re-allow UTF8 encodings on win32.