From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Date: | 2007-10-10 21:13:42 |
Message-ID: | 20071010141342.4ea75d9d@scratch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Looking at the discussion, I think we should just keep it
> in /contrib. The code is tightly tied to our backend transaction
> system so there is logic to have it in /contrib rather than
> pgfoundry. I do think we should just move it into core for 8.4
> though.
In the interest of killing the problem. I agree. Everyone has had ample
opportunity for their opinions and frankly there isn't a good solution,
so let's take the one presented.
It's committed. It is in 8.3.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 21:17:58 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-10 21:10:17 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 21:17:58 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 21:12:34 | Re: Timezone database changes |