Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Date: 2007-10-10 21:13:42
Message-ID: 20071010141342.4ea75d9d@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

>
> Looking at the discussion, I think we should just keep it
> in /contrib. The code is tightly tied to our backend transaction
> system so there is logic to have it in /contrib rather than
> pgfoundry. I do think we should just move it into core for 8.4
> though.

In the interest of killing the problem. I agree. Everyone has had ample
opportunity for their opinions and frankly there isn't a good solution,
so let's take the one presented.

It's committed. It is in 8.3.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-10 21:17:58 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-10-10 21:10:17 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-10 21:17:58 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-10 21:12:34 Re: Timezone database changes