From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
Date: | 2007-10-10 14:34:31 |
Message-ID: | 200710101034.33074.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 02:09, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:14 -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > I would prefer that we backported pg_standby into 8.2 contrib, so the
> > > solution is where people need it to be. If not...
> >
> > Don't know about the policy to put things in already-released-version
> > but if it's not the case, we could at least put the code somewhere in
> > the ftp.postgresql.org. IMHO pgfoundry project will confuse people.
>
> Both: ftp and pgfoundry.
Putting it on pgfoundry would automatically put it in the ftp tree
(ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/projects/pgFoundry) If it was to go on
pgfoundry (which I'd recommend) I'd suggest removing it from 8.3 contrib
before we release (cause having it in both places is really going to cause
confusion)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-10 14:37:48 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-10 14:29:43 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-10 14:37:48 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 14:30:44 | Re: Timezone database changes |