Re: PG_TRY(), PG_CATCH()....

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG_TRY(), PG_CATCH()....
Date: 2007-10-09 13:59:13
Message-ID: 20071009135913.GA16160@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alex Vinogradovs wrote:

> Which works fine with successful queries, but for each
> unsuccessful query it complains about reference leaks
> and not properly closed relations.
> Later on I've solved that with use of subtransactions, which
> provide some proper cleanup mechanisms, but I was wondering
> if it is possible to bypass that layer, and make the code
> above work fine just by doing some cleanup within the catch
> block.

The only code that knows how to cleanup completely after transaction
failure is the subtransaction code. If you need to do something that
may cause a transaction abort, then you must use subtransactions.

(You could of course write "your own layer" but it would duplicate
subtransaction start/abort so there wouldn't be any point.)

It's expensive, yes, but there are good reasons for that. If you are
worried about that, I'm sure there are optimizations possible.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rhys Stewart 2007-10-09 14:09:11 move whole schema to a new tablespace
Previous Message korry.douglas 2007-10-09 13:45:27 Re: "timer" script from SAMS book or equivalent?