From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
Date: | 2007-10-08 21:38:48 |
Message-ID: | 200710081738.49128.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 08 October 2007 16:29, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The whole contrib thing confuses a lot of users. Is it included, or
> isn't it? IMHO, that distinction need to be clear, and I thought we
> were working (if not actively then at least passively) to "retire"
> contrib, moving things either to core or to pgFoundry. Adding yet
> another important feature that's "just in contrib" is making things
> worse, not better.
> IMHO, of course ;-)
>
+1. I felt the same way about pg_standby, which would have been far more
accessible for 8.2 users had it lived on pg_foundry.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-10-08 22:00:21 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-10-08 21:11:15 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-10-08 22:00:21 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-10-08 21:22:17 | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |