From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: default_text_search_config |
Date: | 2007-10-05 07:12:58 |
Message-ID: | 20071005.161258.56048359.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > For me the idea that a text-search configuration maps to a
> > locale/language seems to be totally wrong. IMO an encoding/charset
> > could include several languages and a text-search configuration should
> > be mapped to an encoding/charset, rather than a language.
>
> I think mapping by encoding/charset *is* totally wrong and by locale is
> reasonable. How do you treat LATIN1? It can be used in French and German,
> etc. Moreover, UTF-8 can be used in almost all languages.
>
> The tight mapping of EUC_jp <=> Japanese is a special case in the world.
What? I didn't say that an encoding/charset is mapped to single
language. Actually EUC_JP includes Japanese, English(ascii), Greek,
Cyrillic and so on. So for the full text search being able to process
EUC_JP text properly, it should be able to process multiple languages
at a time.
You know that PostgreSQL allows only one locale for a PostgreSQL
cluster, and the fact that text-search being depending on locale
prevent it from processing multi language text.
The only solution I can think of today is creating new parser which
can process EUC_JP properly (I mean it can process not only Japanese
but also English) and use it on C locale/EUC_JP cluster. I would do
this for 8.4 if I have time.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-10-05 07:40:25 | Re: default_text_search_config |
Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-10-05 06:45:16 | Re: default_text_search_config |