From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |
Date: | 2007-09-29 12:23:46 |
Message-ID: | 200709290823.46305.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 28 September 2007 13:18, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
> > Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
>
> Except then it'll regularly get misspelled as Digress. And
> pronounced Dee'-gray.
>
> I think we should call it Gerwuffle. Like, "Yeah, go install that
> Gerwuffle over there, and twiddle the thingy, and you'll be set to
> go."
>
> Or, of course, we can do what certain other parties with previous
> renaming problems did. We can be The Database Formerly Known as
> Postgres. Then when someone complains about confusion with the
> PostQUEL-using version of the code, we can just become The Database.
> That oughta clear up any confusion, eh?
>
Then CMD could be "The" The Database Company.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-29 16:55:03 | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-09-29 11:12:40 | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |