| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |
| Date: | 2007-09-28 15:56:51 |
| Message-ID: | 200709281156.51856.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 28 September 2007 11:28, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > >JD,
> > >
> > >>Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre
> > >>junk and just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
> > >
> > >I think PG is trademarked by the Motion Picture Association of
> > >America. And you *know* you don't want to tangle with their
> > >attorneys.
> > >
> > >;-)
> > >
> > >I vote for "UltimateDB".
> >
> > Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
>
> +1 ;)
>
Sorry, I have to disagree. I don't think it is clear what the Digres project
would be. Now if you went with DigreSQL, then I'm on board.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-28 16:05:57 | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-09-28 15:55:39 | Re: Cafeconf 2007 |