From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Derek Rodner" <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-26 22:34:42 |
Message-ID: | 200709262334420000@2708130055 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> Sent: 26/09/07, 23:03:11
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Using Postgres as an alias
>
> Devrim's argument about renaming all packages is really strong for me.
I think you missed the point of promoting the preferred short name entirely - it doesn't require changing of any packages at all.
Think of it like an acronym in a paper. You spell it out the first time you use it, then use the short form thereafter. Similarly we can use the full name in packages, titles, introductions etc. and the short form in body text where it improves flow when reading.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-09-26 22:34:44 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-26 22:29:00 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |