From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-26 18:23:50 |
Message-ID: | 200709261823.l8QINoT09982@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In an attempt to get "Postgres" more widely used, I propose changing
> > "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres" in the documentation when there is more
> > than one mention of "PostgreSQL" in the same paragraph.
>
> I don't see why the documentation readers should be the first victims of
> our differences about product naming. Technical documentation is the
> last place where you want to be ambiguous and inconsistent. If you
> want to introduce useless randomness, please start somewhere else.
If we agree we should mention our alias "Postgres" more, where do you
propose we do that? I suggested the documentation and FAQ. Do you have
a better idea?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-26 18:28:15 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-26 18:04:39 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |