From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
Cc: | Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: subquery/alias question |
Date: | 2007-09-25 22:30:48 |
Message-ID: | 20070925223048.GN6440@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 16:59 , Madison Kelly wrote:
>
>> SELECT
>> d.dom_id,
>> d.dom_name,
>> (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id)
>> AS
>> usr_count
>> FROM
>> domains d
>> WHERE
>> (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id) > 0
>> ORDER BY d.dom_name ASC;
>
> Why not just use a join? Something like this would work, I should think:
>
> select dom_id,
> dom_name,
> usr_count
> from domains
> natural join (select usr_dom_id as dom_id,
> count(usr_dom_id) as usr_count
> from users) u
> where usr_count > 0
> order by dom_name;
Maybe the usr_count should be tested in a HAVING clause instead of
WHERE? And put the count(*) in the result list instead of a subselect.
That feels more natural to me anyway.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | paul.dorman | 2007-09-26 02:03:17 | DAGs and recursive queries |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-09-25 22:21:10 | Re: lowering impact of checkpoints |