From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MSVC build scripts status |
Date: | 2007-09-25 13:25:08 |
Message-ID: | 20070925132508.GJ6308@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:58:15PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:20:34PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Irrk. The C file is very wrong indeed. Here's the relevant part where it
> > shoudl be declaring 'customer':
> > /* exec sql type customer is struct { #line 12 "array_of_struct.pgc" struct varchar_name_12 { int len; char arr[ 50 ]; } name ; #line 13 "array_of_struct.pgc" int phone ; } */ #line 14 "array_of_struct.pgc"
> >
> >
> > (all on one line, in case the MUA wraps it)
>
> On Linux it's wrapped. But the new line problem is not what's breaking
> the compiler.
>
> > Seems like the entire definition of the struct is commented out?
>
> This is indeed the problem. I attach the diff so you see that instead of
> typedef'ing the struct it just comments it out.
Yeah, why didn't I remember we had "expected" files for these :-(
Any idea as to *why* it's doing that?
(I'm not getting any warnings or anything when building ecpg that could be
an obvious place to start)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-09-25 13:56:46 | Turn off vacuum in pgbench? |
Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2007-09-25 13:17:16 | Re: Hash index todo list item |