From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MSVC build scripts status |
Date: | 2007-09-25 12:10:38 |
Message-ID: | 20070925121038.GD6308@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:06:49AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>To the best of my knowledge, I was never aware that the ECPG checks ever
> >>ran cleanly for MSVC, so I never enabled it for the buildfarm.
> >>
> >
> >Pah, it's even been in the weekly news ;-)
> >
> >
>
> I read that at best sporadically.
>
> Seriously, though, if you'd monitored your own buildfarm member you
> should have known it wasn't running ECPG checks. The set of steps it
> runs is at the top of every status detail page, e.g.
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skylark&dt=2007-09-24%2023:00:01
> which has no "ecpg-check" stage at the end of the list.
Oh yeah, I fully realise I should've done that. But I was lazy enough to
just look for failures.
> Anyway, get this fixed and I'll enable it for a new release of the
> buildfarm client.
Right.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2007-09-25 12:13:05 | Re: MSVC build scripts status |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-09-25 12:06:49 | Re: MSVC build scripts status |