Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem
Date: 2007-09-17 12:27:39
Message-ID: 20070917122735.GK16759@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:58:10AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> >I'm getting more and more motivated to rewrite the vacuum docs. I think
> >a rewrite from the ground up might be best... I keep seeing people
> >doing vacuum full on this list and I'm thinking it's as much because of
> >the way the docs represent vacuum full as anything.
>
> I agree you shouldn't start thinking in terms of how to fix the existing
> documentation. I'd suggest instead writing a tutorial leading someone
> through what they need to know about their tables first and then going
> into how vacuum works based on that data.

Take a look at the stuff at http://decibel.org/~decibel/pervasive/, it'd
hopefully provide a useful starting point.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-17 13:37:09 Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2007-09-17 12:27:15 Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used