| From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem |
| Date: | 2007-09-17 12:27:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20070917122735.GK16759@decibel.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:58:10AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> >I'm getting more and more motivated to rewrite the vacuum docs. I think
> >a rewrite from the ground up might be best... I keep seeing people
> >doing vacuum full on this list and I'm thinking it's as much because of
> >the way the docs represent vacuum full as anything.
>
> I agree you shouldn't start thinking in terms of how to fix the existing
> documentation. I'd suggest instead writing a tutorial leading someone
> through what they need to know about their tables first and then going
> into how vacuum works based on that data.
Take a look at the stuff at http://decibel.org/~decibel/pervasive/, it'd
hopefully provide a useful starting point.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-17 13:37:09 | Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-09-17 12:27:15 | Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used |