From: | Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Change the name |
Date: | 2007-09-15 12:09:44 |
Message-ID: | 20070915120944.GB20499@yellowbank.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
2007-09-15_07:44:38-0400 Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>:
> >That already happened. There has only been one official name for some
> >time now, but people still continue using an unofficial name that they
> >like better. How would switching the official name change this?
>
> Huh? That seems obvious: switching to the easier name means adopting
> what people generally seem to like better. So that nobody must
> abbreviate the name anymore, because it's short and simple enough.
That's based on the assumption that everyone believes 'Postgres' is
clearly a better name, and that 'PostgreSQL' was simply an unfortunate
historical accident. That's not true.
--
Ron Peterson
https://www.yellowbank.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Peterson | 2007-09-15 12:58:33 | Re: Change the name |
Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-09-15 11:44:38 | Re: Change the name |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Peterson | 2007-09-15 12:58:33 | Re: Change the name |
Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-09-15 11:44:38 | Re: Change the name |