From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL |
Date: | 2007-09-12 22:30:22 |
Message-ID: | 20070912223022.GC6627@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>
> --- Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know if this will work, but here is another idea:
> > >
> > > SELECT movie_id, movie_name
> > > FROM get_movies() AS ( int4 NOT NULL, text NOT NULL );
> > >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nope. That's not even valid syntax...
>
> It isn't valid SQL spec syntax but it is a Postgresql-ism for functions return types:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-select.html
>
> notice this "from-type" listing for functions.
Yeah, but it doesn't allow the NOT NULL specification.
I don't think there's any way to do what the OP wants ATM.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
Voy a acabar con todos los humanos / con los humanos yo acabaré
voy a acabar con todos / con todos los humanos acabaré (Bender)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cultural Sublimation | 2007-09-12 22:51:14 | Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-12 22:26:45 | Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL |