| From: | Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: replacing Access/ Approach etc |
| Date: | 2007-09-08 14:58:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20070908145834.GK1904@freedbms.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:45:21AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On 9/8/07, Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> wrote:
> > A lack of a sense of control is simply one more barrier to potential
> > switchers. Make sense?
>
> But by starting postgresql under an administrative account, the user
> would, in effect, be giving up that control to PostgreSQL to simply do
> as it pleased with the machine.
>
> The real problem here is the common perception in Windows user's minds
> that running as an admin account is acceptable. It's not. It's
> dangerous. If your friend was following the basic tenant of not
> running as an admin all the time, there would be no problem. He, and
> many other windows users, have a bad habit to unlearn. Making
> PostgreSQL part of the problem is not the solution.
I agree. And my recommendation for _next_ time he reinstalls his
windows/ sets up his machine, will be to arrange to live in a
non-privileged account. I don't know when that will be.
In the meantimem, is there any option to allow pg to run in a privileged
account on windows?
Thanks again for the feedback, it is appreciated,
Zen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-09-08 15:28:52 | Re: Connection pooling |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-09-08 14:45:21 | Re: replacing Access/ Approach etc |