From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Franz(dot)Rasper(at)izb(dot)de |
Cc: | tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de, stefan(dot)schwarzer(at)grid(dot)unep(dot)ch, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alias "all fields"? |
Date: | 2007-09-06 15:27:41 |
Message-ID: | 20070906152741.GB8709@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Franz(dot)Rasper(at)izb(dot)de wrote:
>
> > Make the table:
>
> > id | year | value
> > ---+------+------
> > 1 | 1970 | 23
> > 1 | 1971 | 25
> > 1 | 1972 | 28
> > ...
> > 2 | 1972 | 5
> > 3 | 1971 | 94
> > 3 | 1972 | 102
>
> > primary key: (id,year)
> > value not null
> > and be ready.
> >the import/update reasons are pretty easily solved
> >that way too.
>
> then your primary key will consists of two fields.
> I prefer the primary keys with one field only.
Is there any reason for that preference?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-09-06 15:29:56 | Re: Need suggestion on how best to update 3 million rows |
Previous Message | Eric Pailleau | 2007-09-06 15:22:33 | archive_command with an environnement variable ? |