From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
Date: | 2007-09-05 22:07:21 |
Message-ID: | 200709052207.l85M7L306505@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I am thinking we are best just doing the index chain we already have to
> > read.
>
> > If you are modifying the table (like with UPDATE) it makes sense to be
> > more aggressive and do the whole page because you know there are
> > probably other table modifications, but for an index lookup there isn't
> > any knowledge of whether the table is being modified so looking at more
> > than we need seems like overkill.
>
> Uh, why would any of this code at all execute during a pure lookup?
No idea. It seems an index lookup tries to prune a heap chain, and he
was asking if it should look at other chains on the page; I said not.
Whether the index lookup should prune the heap chain is another issue.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-05 22:07:53 | Re: Lazy xid assignment V4 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-09-05 21:59:06 | Re: Lazy xid assignment V4 |