From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andy Astor <andy(dot)astor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 15:58:28 |
Message-ID: | 200709031558.l83FwSP06743@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Oh, one more thing. I think it is illustrative to look at the areas we
_didn't_ change when we went from "Postgres95" to "PostgreSQL": the
super-user name and the backend binary name. Those were kept as
"postgres", and I remember no questions about why those are "postgres".
What that means to me is that "Postgres" was easily associates with
"PostgreSQL", and if we change our name to "Postgres", "PostgreSQL" will
still be easily associates with the project, so perhaps we don't need to
change the name of the download binaries or postgresql.conf.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-09-03 16:39:28 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 15:31:25 | Re: A renaming analogy |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-09-03 16:39:28 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 15:19:43 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |