| From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Attempt to stop dead instance can stop a random process? |
| Date: | 2007-09-01 08:06:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20070901080647.GB18426@www.trapp.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 12:57:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de writes:
> > Hm. I've come to expect the OS removing all pidfiles early at bootup.
>
> If there's a script in your system that does that, then adding Postgres
> lockfiles to it makes all kinds of sense. Our problem as upstream
> software is that this isn't something well-standardized that we could
> plug into ...
Right -- this becomes the distributor's job (when compiling from
sources, the distributor is the sysadmin). Upstream can only recommend.
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG2R2XBcgs9XrR2kYRAoNDAJ9gN3ytdJzXyzJ0/MKTzWVZvq/X3ACfZtQm
cVYkpNrJqhvRjtUvm/5co0c=
=HBPE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-01 16:41:28 | Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-01 04:57:35 | Re: Attempt to stop dead instance can stop a random process? |