Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Joe Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> In summary, looking at possible conclusions to this discussion, I think
>> we have:
>> 1) No change
>> 2) Emphasize "Postgres" more as an alternative
>> 3) Change the name to "PostgresQL"
>> 4) Change the name to "Postgres QL"
>> 5) Change the name to "Postgres"
>
> 6) Change the name to "Postgres" and emphasize "PostgreSQL" as
> an alternative
>
> My vote -- #6. Announce it with release of 8.3. Allow a relatively slow,
> natural transition from "PostgreSQL with Postgres as alt" to "Postgres with
> PostgreSQL as alt" (e.g. over the course of a year or so as has been
> mentioned).

+1 to #6 and the rest of Joe's opinion.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you
not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)