Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-29 20:44:12
Message-ID: 20070829204412.GS7911@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Ron Mayer wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > There _will_ be confusion, work
> > for package maintainers, nasty upgrade problems with oldbies who say,
> > "Oh, I don't want Postgres; I want the SQL-engine one," and edits to
> > the manual.
>
> For those people, perhaps we rename "postmaster" to "postSQLmaster"
> so they don't get too confused and can still see that SQL's in there
> somewhere.

Actually, the daemon got renamed -- it's not called "postmaster"
anymore, nowadays (8.3) the name is "postgres". The old name still
works though.

--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"Y eso te lo doy firmado con mis lágrimas" (Fiebre del Loco)

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2007-08-29 21:09:15 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2007-08-29 20:42:27 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)