Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-29 11:38:13
Message-ID: 200708291338.14301.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Am Dienstag, 28. August 2007 18:34 schrieb Neil Conway:
> On Tue, 2007-28-08 at 11:15 -0400, Robert Bernier wrote:
> > How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0'
> > reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work
> > involved out of the debate for the moment)?
>
> +1 -- I think we should make the name change, but I don't have any
> strong preference about when we ought to do it (now, for 8.3, for 8.4,
> etc -- I wouldn't necessarily want to wait for some far-off theoretical
> 9.0 release).

I agree with that.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-08-29 12:40:25 Re: When MySQL Bites: Quirks to Watch Out For
Previous Message vincent 2007-08-29 08:05:55 Re: When MySQL Bites: Quirks to Watch Out For