From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, "Joey K(dot)" <pguser(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Seeking datacenter PITR backup suggestions |
Date: | 2007-08-29 00:05:30 |
Message-ID: | 20070829000529.GO1386@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 08:31:10PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Steve Crawford" <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
>
> > 4. Much more up-to-the-minute recovery data.
> >
> > In your scenario, what about using "cp -l" (or "ln") instead? Since the
> > hard-link it is only creating a new pointer, it will be very fast and
> > save a bunch of disk IO on your server and it doesn't appear that the
> > tempdir is for much other than organizing purposes anyway.
>
> Postgres tries to reuse WAL files. Once the archive_command completes it
> believes it is safe to reuse the old file without deleting it. That will do
> nasty things if you've used ln as your archive command.
I thought that was specifically disabled when PITR was enabled? Or do we
just do a rename rather than an unlink ond creating a new file?
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-29 00:16:20 | Re: Seeking datacenter PITR backup procedures [RESENDING] |
Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-29 00:03:49 | Re: Seeking datacenter PITR backup suggestions |