Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> Apologies, Andrew, but I think this is a very important topic, and
> one that should be addressed.
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > My perspective on the naming question is that if we wanted to do it, we needed
> > to do it for 8.0 which was when PostgreSQL became much higher profile. We
> > did seriously evaluate it at that time, but the amount of effort involved
> > would have held up the release and we decided not to.
>
> That's not my recollection. I recall battling to make 7.5 into 8.0, but there was
> no real debate about a name change at that time. Since then, however, I've talked to
> lots of people about changing the name and found no real objection, only
> support, including from most of Core. Even Tom Lane admits it was a mistake:
> http://tinyurl.com/2v4fdl

FYI, I have always been in favor of a name change, in 1996, and before
8.0, but of course I am only one vote.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +