| From: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Derek Rodner" <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-08-28 19:23:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200708281523.23842.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:17, Derek Rodner wrote:
> Actually, Stefan, that isn't a bad idea either (within reason). The
> most successful companies are those who listen, really listen, to their
> customers. Having an end-user board that has some oversight is actually
> not a bad idea in any situation.
>
> I would be interested to see if any other open source projects do it.
> That way you don't go implementing Klingon as a supported language when
> everyone is really developing in Wookie these days.
http://www.bsdcertification.org/
They've done extensive international polling and analysis of the BSD community developing worldwide systems adminstration standards.
Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-28 19:23:29 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Ron Peterson | 2007-08-28 19:22:50 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |