From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Database normalization |
Date: | 2007-08-28 13:26:04 |
Message-ID: | 20070828132604.GB461@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:47:45PM +0100, Sebastian Ritter wrote:
> > The update/message format is exactly the same for both. Should I make two
> > different tables:
> > one table with extra columns : is_client, client_id, service_id, where
> > either client_id or service_id would be null depending on the is_client
> > boolean?
Is the rest of the data the same? If so, then one table is right.
If not, then more than one table. In either case, I really hate the
idea of two columns, one of which is always null. But if you're
going to do that, make sure you add a CHECK constraint where !(col1
IS NULL and col2 IS NULL).
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sebastian Ritter | 2007-08-28 14:37:22 | Re: Database normalization |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2007-08-28 13:13:19 | Re: fetch first rows of grouped data |