Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Derek Rodner" <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Bernier" <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-28 19:22:35
Message-ID: 200708281222.37442.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Derek,

> Regardless, even if Josh changes the company name, I believe that the
> benefits far outweigh that potential negative and we should move
> forward.

You say that because you weren't around when PostgreSQL, Inc. was active.
There was a time when the *first* question I had to answer at a booth was
to explain that we were not PostgreSQL, Inc. I don't want to go back to
that time.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Peterson 2007-08-28 19:22:50 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Derek Rodner 2007-08-28 19:18:05 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)