| From: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance? |
| Date: | 2007-08-27 19:46:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200708271546.43164.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 27 August 2007 15:36, Ron Peterson wrote:
> 2007-08-27_14:49:54-0400 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>:
>
> * It's google'able. Think of all of the documentation out there which
> refers to PostgreSQL. When people start searching for 'postgres'
> they'll get virtually nothing.
FYI: I never google postgresql, always postgres
> * Why 'Postgres'? Any marketing effort this large should start from
> scratch, and consider all possibilities, not just default to something
> barely different for the sake of easing the terrible pronunciation
> challenge.
I've noticed that it's easier pronouncing 'Postgres' than 'PostgreSQL' in languages other than English (the SQL part gets lost in the translation).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-08-27 19:58:06 | Re: Theme of this release: Performance? |
| Previous Message | Ron Peterson | 2007-08-27 19:36:57 | Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance? |