From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Joel Richard <postgres(at)joelrichard(dot)com> |
Cc: | Claudia Kosny <ckosny(at)gmx(dot)net>, sql pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fetch first rows of grouped data |
Date: | 2007-08-27 18:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 20070827141552.21ec3a54.darcy@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:34:09 -0400
Joel Richard <postgres(at)joelrichard(dot)com> wrote:
> That's what I thought at first, but this is not the case. She's
> looking for the first two dates in -each- city in the table. I
> initially thought that this could be accomplished with GROUP BY and
> LIMIT, but GROUP BY can only give you the first date for each city,
> not the first two dates for each city.
Yes, you are correct. My mistake.
> So far, I haven't come up with any clever ideas. I'm not sure this
> can be done in SQL.
Well, I can think of an SQL only method involving a temporary table but
it would not be a single query:
- Select into temp table where date is max.
- Select from temp table union with main table where date is max and
is not in temp table.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2007-08-27 18:20:18 | Re: fetch first rows of grouped data |
Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2007-08-27 18:12:48 | Re: fetch first rows of grouped data |