Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Trevor Talbot <quension(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Terry Yapt <yapt(at)technovell(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32)
Date: 2007-08-24 16:04:56
Message-ID: 20070824160456.GN31461@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane escribió:

> There are a few old bits of code that still use MAKE_PTR/MAKE_OFFSET,
> but I think it's mostly just that no one's bothered to rewrite the code
> for SHM_QUEUE linked lists. The vast majority of our shmem structures
> use regular pointers, and have for years.

... except that, not knowing that, I wrote part of the new autovac code
using MAKE_PTR/OFFSET, and it needs to be rewritten eventually :-(

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-08-24 16:17:21 Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32)
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2007-08-24 16:01:13 Re: [OT - sorta] How to extract a substring using Regex