Re: Another idea for index-only scans

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Another idea for index-only scans
Date: 2007-08-15 18:43:23
Message-ID: 200708151143.23960.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce,

> I have added another idea for index-only scans to the TODO list:
> > A third idea would be for a heap scan to check if all rows are
> > visible and if so set a per-table flag which can be checked by index
> > scans. Any change to the table would have to clear the flag. To
> > detect changes during the heap scan a counter could be set at the
> > start and checked at the end --- if it is the same, the table has not
> > been modified --- any table change would increment the counter.

Seems marginal at best. Checking overlap between the index and the FSM/DSM
and only check dirty pages seems more intelligent, and able to cover a
larger number of cases.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-08-15 18:45:17 Re: change name of redirect_stderr?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-15 17:54:58 Re: XID wraparound and busy databases