From: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |
Date: | 2007-08-15 15:33:01 |
Message-ID: | 200708150833.01483.darcyb@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On August 15, 2007 08:17 am, Bob Zurek wrote:
> Agree..but doesn't it make sense to start with what is perceived as the
> head to head competitor in the open source space first?
No it does not, that is like asking Porsche to go head to head with Yugo.
Just because the 2 are on the same price point does not mean they are in the
same class. And I agree while having some sort of comparison sheet that says
why pg over mysql, we should have the same for the real DB's in our class.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 7:48 PM
> To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: Bob Zurek
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 12 Silver Bullets
>
> Bob,
>
> > Anyone ever put together something I call a Silver Bullet list that
> > showcases the top 12 features in PostgreSQL that could kill MySQL?
> >
> > Care to contribute? Any advice?
>
> Have you read the discussion and wiki pages around PostgreSQL vs. MySQL?
>
> Also, quite frankly, I'm thinking that I'd rather target the DBs with
> money
> (Oracle, DB2, MSSQL).
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Command Prompt, Inc.
+1.503.667.4564 X 102
http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-08-15 17:20:13 | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |
Previous Message | Bob Zurek | 2007-08-15 15:17:48 | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |