From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Ben-Nes <miki(at)epoch(dot)co(dot)il> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RAID 10 or RAID 10 + RAID 1 |
Date: | 2007-08-14 21:31:50 |
Message-ID: | 20070814213150.GT54135@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 01:14:39PM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to setup a web server with PostgreSQL. The heaviest application will
> be product comparisons engine that will analyze 5-10 Million products.
>
> I have 6 SAS 15K disks, how should I set them up:
>
> RAID 10 on all 6 disks ( OS + Apache + PostgreSQL )
> RAID 1 on 2 disks ( OS + Apache ) + RAID 10 on 4 disks ( PostgreSQL )
If the controller is any good and has a battery-backed write cache,
you'll probably do better with a 6 disk RAID10. If not, I'd put all the
data on a 4 disk RAID10, and everything else (including pg_xlog!) on a
mirror.
> What is the recommended stripe size ( The computer is Dell PowerEdge 2950 )
If you search through the archives I think you'll find some stuff about
stripe size and performance.
As always, your best bet is to benchmark both approaches with your
actual application.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sebastián Baioni | 2007-08-15 19:36:45 | Indexscan is only used if we use "limit n" |
Previous Message | Michael Ben-Nes | 2007-08-14 10:14:39 | RAID 10 or RAID 10 + RAID 1 |