Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]
Date: 2007-08-14 21:08:27
Message-ID: 20070814210827.GQ54135@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:38:33PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2007/8/14, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> >
> > TODO item?
> >
> > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
> I am against. It's too simple do it in SQL language.

Why make everyone who works with arrays create a function just to do
this? Something that's of use to common users should be included, simple
or not.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-08-14 21:11:49 Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2007-08-14 20:57:16 Re: change name of redirect_stderr?