From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: change name of redirect_stderr? |
Date: | 2007-08-14 16:49:30 |
Message-ID: | 20070814164930.GF9206@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > >>> That sounds like you want to log when the collector starts, which is not
> > >>> the case and is confusing -- what collector is it talking about? This
> > >>> is about starting the log collector.
> > >>>
> > >> Yea, good point. I was just wondering because I don't see 'start' used
> > >> in anywhere at the beginning of a GUC variable.
> > >
> > > Good point too. In other places we just name the feature that's to be
> > > started, for example we don't use "start_autovacuum".
> >
> > How about just "log_collector" then?
> >
> > Lets decide ASAP please - I want to get this committed.
>
> Works for me, or enable_log_collector? Based on Alvaro's comments,
> log_collector does sound like we are logging collector activity.
The problem here is that "log" seems to be a verb in "log_collector"
which is what makes it confusing. So we need another verb to make it
clear that "log" is not one. This is not a problem with "autovacuum"
because that one cannot be confused with a verb.
start_log_collector still gets my vote.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2007-08-14 17:01:55 | Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions] |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-08-14 16:49:05 | Re: change name of redirect_stderr? |