From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions] |
Date: | 2007-08-14 15:05:31 |
Message-ID: | 200708141505.l7EF5VV27340@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
TODO item?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
>
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:18 , Decibel! wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:03:34PM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> >> Personally, I think expandarray is more appropriate and its
> >> functionality probably more generally useful, as it identifies the
> >> array indices as well. Note you can also rename the columns.
> >
> > Sure. My point is that we should have a way to convert arrays to sets
> > and back in the backend.
>
> Can't really argue with you there, as I find array_accum myself.
> (Though I'd still nit-pick that this isn't an array to set
> conversion, but rather array to--possibly single-column--table.)
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
>
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-14 15:22:05 | Re: GUC for default heap fillfactor |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-08-14 14:37:25 | Re: Testing the async-commit patch |