From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: More logging for autovacuum |
Date: | 2007-08-07 17:38:54 |
Message-ID: | 200708071938.55807.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yes, by default or at least at no level higher than INFO.
>
> No, NOT by default. Our users have made it perfectly clear that they
> don't want the logs cluttered with high-volume information about
> non-error normal workings of the system. Every time we have caused
> the system to emit such data by default, the log level of the
> messages in question has gotten dialed down in a later release.
But INFO is not shown by default.
In fact, just about the only useful thing that emits INFO messages is
VACUUM VERBOSE, so there is a fair precedent for equating the INFO
level with lots of chatter about VACUUM.
I like to set log_min_messages to INFO (and run vacuum verbosely) while
a system is stabilizing, so adding autovacuum information there would
come in handy.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-07 17:46:36 | Re: .NET driver |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-07 17:12:18 | Re: More logging for autovacuum |